BLACK mobile logo

united states

Could US Congress stop Trump from taking over Greenland?

January 21, 2026

President Trump's aggressive pursuit of Greenland has created an unusual rift with Congressional Republicans, who are joining Democrats in opposing what they view as a potential violation of international law and threat to NATO unity. While Trump insists acquiring Greenland is necessary for national security to counter China and Russia in the Arctic, lawmakers from both parties are concerned about his unilateral use of military and economic force abroad, despite his 2024 campaign promises to reduce foreign entanglements. Congress holds constitutional powers over funding and treaty ratification that could theoretically block a Greenland acquisition, though Trump's administration has shown willingness to expand executive authority on other issues.

Who is affected

  • Greenland and its self-governing population
  • Denmark (Greenland's controlling nation)
  • NATO alliance members, particularly European allies
  • American businesses (affected by proposed tariffs)
  • Congressional Republicans and Democrats
  • China and Russia (competitors in the Arctic region)
  • Venezuela (subject of previous military intervention)
  • Iran (mentioned as subject of coercion)

What action is being taken

  • Trump is pushing to acquire Greenland through diplomatic, economic, or potentially military means
  • The Trump administration is proposing tariffs on countries that don't support the Greenland acquisition bid
  • A bipartisan congressional delegation visited Denmark as a symbolic show of support
  • Some Republican lawmakers are joining Democrats in opposing Trump's Greenland plans
  • The administration is expanding use of executive power to enact various agenda items

Why it matters

  • This represents a significant fracture in Republican unity behind Trump's foreign policy and tests the constitutional balance of power between the executive and legislative branches. A US takeover of Greenland would violate international law and potentially shatter NATO, the cornerstone Western security alliance, at a time of global instability. The issue extends beyond Greenland to broader concerns about unilateral presidential use of military force and whether Trump will honor congressional oversight or continue expanding executive authority, which could fundamentally reshape how American foreign policy is conducted.

What's next

  • No explicit next steps stated in the article

Read full article from source: BBC